Bulk extensions

* As a FOI analyst
* I want the ability to grant "bulk" extensions
* so that I can efficiently grant extensions to multiple requests when circumstances require it

Real-world Examples:
- With the floods both TRAN and AGRI have received extensions for all of their requests.
- At the start of COVID, the OIPC granted 30 day extensions to all public bodies in BC. They were applied to current requests in every Ministry
- Other times certain program areas have been given bulk extensions (ie: BC Wildfire Service requests during bad fire seasons)

**Assumptions & Scope**
What are the assumptions for this story?

What is IN scope?

What is NOT in scope?

**Acceptance Criteria**

**Scenario 1: xxxxxx**
* GIVEN ... (you or your condition)
* WHEN ... (what you do)
* THEN ... (what you see)

**Scenario 2: xxxxxx**
* GIVEN ... (you or your condition)
* WHEN ... (what you do)
* THEN ... (what you see)

**Scenario 3: xxxxxx**
...

**Dependencies? What is the impact of this dependency? (If so, link dependency in the ticket, make it visible in a team´s backlog)**

**Validation Rules? (If yes, list here)**

**Design**
@xxx - please link the Design here

**Definition of Ready**

1. [ ] Is there a well articulated User Story?
2. [ ] Is there Acceptance Criteria that covers all scenarios (happy/sad paths)?
3. [ ] If there is a user interface, is there a design?
4. [ ] Does the user story need user research/validation?
5. [ ] Does this User Story needs stakeholder approval?
6. [ ] Design / Solution accepted by Product Owner
7. [ ] Is this user story small enough to be completed in a Sprint? Should it be split?
8. [ ] Are the dependencies known/ understood? (technical, business, regulatory/policy)
9. [ ] Has the story been estimated?

**Definition of Done**

1. [ ] Passes developer unit tests
2. [ ] Passes peer code review
3. [ ] If there's a user interface, passes UX assurance
4. [ ] Passes QA of Acceptance Criteria with verification in Dev and Test
5. [ ] Confirm Test cases built and succeeding
6. [ ] No regression test failures
7. [ ] Test coverage acceptable by Product Owner
8. [ ] Ticket ready to be merged to master or story branch
9. [ ] Developer to list Config changes/ Update documents and designs
10. [ ] Can be demoed in Sprint Review
11. [ ] Tagged as part of a Release
12. [ ] Feature flagged if required
13. [ ] Change Management activities done?

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. First clarify the assumptions, scope, acceptance criteria, validation rules, dependencies, and design for granting extensions across multiple requests or public bodies. Done should include agreed scenarios, implementation, tests, and documented configuration or process changes.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.