OIPC Review
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 2
- Avg merge
- 14h 34m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 46
Description
## Description:
- Short Description of the needed Epic in the below format
* As a (who/ person)
* I want (what/ goal)
* so that (why/ benefit proposal)
* What are the most critical features being built as part of this Epic
* Expected Outcome – Justification why this Feature must be built, what is expected value and justification for priority.
----
**Sizing**
* T-shirt size:
[ ] S
[ ] M
[ ] L
[ ] XL
(S=1-2 Sprints, M=2-3 Sprints, L=4-5 Sprints, XL=not sure, probably more than 5 Sprints).
* *Risks and Assumptions**
1. [ ] What are assumptions?
2. [ ] What are the risks?
3. [ ] Have we done an RFC on a technical approach?
4. [ ] Are the dependencies (technical, business, regulatory/policy) known?
5. [ ] Has work on this Epic been prioritized with key stakeholders?
Contributor guide
Research direction
The issue contains an OIPC Review Epic template but does not identify implementation files, tests, or a technical entry point. Start by defining the requested feature, expected outcome, scope, risks, dependencies, and RFC status; it is done when the Epic template is complete and the work is prioritized.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- developer-experience
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 10/100