Document Reviewer / Redaction App
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 2
- Avg merge
- 14h 34m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 46
Description
## Description:
- Short Description of the needed Epic in the below format
* As a (who/ person)
* I want (what/ goal)
* so that (why/ benefit proposal)
* What are the most critical features being built as part of this Epic
Redaction
Organize records
Navigate records
Comments and Annotations
* Expected Outcome – Justification why this Feature must be built, what is expected value and justification for priority.
----
**Sizing**
* T-shirt size:
[ ] S
[ ] M
[ ] L
[ ] XL
(S=1-2 Sprints, M=2-3 Sprints, L=4-5 Sprints, XL=not sure, probably more than 5 Sprints).
* *Risks and Assumptions**
1. [ ] What are assumptions?
2. [ ] What are the risks?
3. [ ] Have we done an RFC on a technical approach?
4. [ ] Are the dependencies (technical, business, regulatory/policy) known?
5. [ ] Has work on this Epic been prioritized with key stakeholders?
Contributor guide
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by clarifying the user story, scope, technical approach, dependencies, risks, and priority described in the Epic; work is not done until the redaction, record organization and navigation, comments, and annotations requirements have concrete acceptance criteria.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100