AUTO-ANALYZE-Adjust Well-Formed Name for <DESC> <DIST> <DESC> ... Pattern

## Description:

We have a rule that say if a word is classified as both a DIST and a DESC and it is a synonym than treat it as a DESC.
We also have another rule that says ignore anything after the last DESC. The last DESC is the one before another DIST after the first word. In the case of the pattern this ends up ignoring everything after the first DESC. This cause an error in the back-end as a list has no values.

Our example is CANDY CANE

Acceptance for a Task:
- [ ] Requires deployments
- [ ] Add/ maintain selectors for QA purposes
- [ ] Test coverage acceptable
- [ ] Linters passed
- [ ] Peer Reviewed
- [ ] PR Accepted
- [ ] Production burn in completed

No file or test is named in the issue. Start by locating the AUTO-ANALYZE well-formed-name logic and reproduce the CANDY CANE case; done means the DESC–DIST–DESC pattern no longer produces an empty list and has acceptable regression coverage.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.