Investigate: Correction ledger text
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 23
- Forks
- 62
- Avg merge
- 24m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
In working on the backfill pipeline(#30326), a question was brought up about the ledger text mapping for correction/amendment filings.
> COLIN correction/amendment ledger text maps to the comments table. Should the correction.associated_doc_desc also be in the comment?
> For example, GCP DEV BC0047143 has the comment:
> FILED MARCH 24, 2006 - COMMON SHARES WERE INCORRECTLY SHOWN "WITH" SPECIAL RIGHTS AND RESTRICTIONS, SHOULD BE "WITHOUT"
> From COLIN amendment AM_SS filing type event id 7204054, populating comments.comment with both COLIN correction.associated_doc_desc and ledger_text.notation would look like this:
> TRANSITION APPLICATION FILED MARCH 24, 2006 - COMMON SHARES WERE INCORRECTLY SHOWN "WITH" SPECIAL RIGHTS AND RESTRICTIONS, SHOULD BE "WITHOUT"
Some initial analysis of how ledger text looks in COLIN and modernized system for BC0047143 can be found in following screenshot.

The ledger text seems ok as it’s like for like. But is “Document Amended: TRANSITION APPLICATION” required in the modernized ledger?
**Tasks**
- [ ] Investigate whether we need to change how we bring over ledger text and how we display ledger text for amendmetns/corrections
- [ ] Cut tickets to fix tombstone/backfill pipeline as req’d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.