Legal API Validation - TING Put Back On - After MVP
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 23
- Forks
- 62
- Avg merge
- 24m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
In short: when putting back on a TING, should we validate that the TED has been dissolved?
Solution is define in this ticket- [14683](https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/entities---olga-65af15f59e89f5043c2911f7/issues/gh/bcgov/entity/14683)
- [ ] if the TED was dissolved with Administrative Dissolution, then allow TINGs to be Put Back On
For MVP release (to keep it simple, without increasing complexity) - Put Back On will be available for TINGs, and there won’t be a validation that TED is dissolved. Staff will be responsible for ensuring the Put Back On option is used properly in this scenario. (We can implement such validation as an enhancement later, possibly after the MVP). OK
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with the linked ZenHub ticket 14683 and trace the legal API's TING Put Back On flow. Confirm the administrative-dissolution rule described there, then verify that a TING with a dissolved TED is allowed while the MVP behavior remains unchanged until the validation is implemented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- api, backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100