Fix the Annual Report AGM validation message
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 23
- Forks
- 62
- Avg merge
- 24m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
The AGM date currently looks at last COA, COD and Annual Report Dates (ARD). The AGM date should be after all these dates.
However, the validation message is confusing because it gives an impression that you changed address/directors after the selected AGM date.
Suggested fix: We may have to change the wording to also reflect that the AGM date should be **after** the AGM date of previous AR filings. UX/Business to provide actual wording
Cc: @lmcclung
- [ ] Update the warning message (red text under the date picker) that triggers when you enter an AGM date that is before another filing's effective date
- [x] Implementation of validation that ensures the selected date isn't before any of the effective dates among COA, COD and ARD.
(This description is updated on 05/02/2022)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Locate the AGM date picker and the red validation warning for dates before COA, COD, or ARD effective dates. Read the existing validation and confirm the final wording with UX/Business. Done means the warning clearly explains that the AGM date must follow the relevant prior filing dates, while the existing validation still triggers correctly.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- frontend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100