bcgov / bcgov/Gov-2.0-Bootstrap-Skeleton
Why so many repos about styles?
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 9
- Forks
- 10
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I'm the author of yet another style repo, [here](https://github.com/bcgov/mygovbc-bootstrap-theme).
I had to take a different direction than this repo, but I would like to unite our efforts. Could we incorporate the good from both or should we consciously allow both?
The good, and the reason for divergence, about this repo is [mygovbc-bootstrap-theme](https://github.com/bcgov/mygovbc-bootstrap-theme):
1. Integrated with npm/yarn for easy dependency management
1. Uses 99% bootstrap, no custom classes to learn
1. Has demo page to view all styles
1. Comes pre-concatenated, uglified
Thoughts from the community please!
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by comparing this repository with the linked mygovbc-bootstrap-theme, focusing on the four listed differences: dependency management, Bootstrap usage, the demo page, and prebuilt assets. The issue has no agreed direction or concrete completion criteria, so a maintainer decision would be needed before implementation could begin.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- bootstrap
- Domain
- frontend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100