IDFxh1/Gg
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Both Py and Fd show a slightly increasing compatibility on a generic grassland type in the IDFxh1 in which both are modelled at about 30% feasibility by the end of the century. This does not make a lot of sense to me. It is worth noting that there is also in general an edatopic difference between grasslands and forested areas in that the former tend to have finer-textured soils that favour grassland establishment over that of forests. Increasing temperature is not going to change this so that Gg sites are likely to remain Gg sites in the future irrespective of changes in precipitation and temperature.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by locating the feasibility model or data for IDFxh1 and compare the projected Gg, Py, and Fd results through the end of the century. Done means the reported behavior is validated or a specific model or data correction is defined.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100