Declining Ba on D6 sites in CWHvh2
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
**Disconnect between mapped CCISS results (both 2 panel maps and ByBEC) and the CCISS tool. Maps show declining feasibility in CWHvh2 (and on outer coast) for D6, while CCISS tool shows that feasibility is maintained on 07, 08 and 09 site series. Artefact of declining feasibility on site series 13 (and 18, 19?).**
Ba feasibility increases from the Central to North Coast in the hypermaritime region, i.e. CWHvh2, on zonal sites. In the same region, Ba feasibility declines on D6 sites – artefact of the mapping.
o CWHvh2/01 (C4) feasibility increases from tertiary species to secondary (primary). **Projection is 100% CWHvh1 by 2041-2060. *no good analog (raised in separate issue)**
o CWHvh2/07 /08 and /09 (D6) feasibility is maintained as a primary species in the CCISS tool.
o CWHvh2/13 feasibility decreases.
CWHvh2/01 – C4
CWHvh2/07 – D6. Feasibility is maintained (same for 08 and 09 sites).
CWHvh2/13 – D6. Feasibility is declining.
CWHvh2/19 – Pacific crab apple. D6. Site series 18 and 19 do not have Ba, but show up as declining. Are these site series also factored in to the overall “D6” calculations?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.