bcgov / bcgov/CCISS_Review

Need more spp in suit ratings in ESSFun

Open
#71 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
1
Forks
0
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Likely need Se and potentially other spp in suitability table? - currently only have Bl

![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6d1e6864-3efd-4a15-89cc-c0c8d3a4db0c)

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Locate the ESSFun suitability table and review its existing Bl entry. Confirm which species, including Se if applicable, and which suitability ratings are required. Done means the agreed species have the appropriate entries in the table.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
data
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.