Coast transition declining Sx feasibility
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
In the coast transition region Sx feasibility is lost as you move east to west and is being replaced by Ss (Sitka spruce). In the CCISS tool declining feasibility in this region, is actually being replaced by Ss.
o Where CWH units are projected to move further inland, you lose Sx feasibility.
o Spruce is still good, but need to choose the right mix.
E.g. Sx on C4 sites. Near Bella Bella, ESSFmw
**Declining Sx replaced by Ss**
CWH units are being projected.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are identified. Start by reviewing the CCISS tool's coast-transition feasibility rules using the CWH, ESSFmw, C4, Bella Bella, Sx, and Ss examples and attached images; done means the intended Sx-to-Ss transition is defined and the affected projections are corrected.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100