Declining Sx feasibility near Fort St. John
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Major decline in feasibility in SWBSmw/101 (north of Fort St. John) – shifts to SBAPcp. Is Sx really not feasible? Need to look at this area and the feasibility tables for the AB units moving in.
(Declining feasibility on C4 and D6 site types)
SWBSmw/101
SBAPcp = grassland unit from near Edmonton, only At is feasible on zonal sites. Sw is present on SBAPcp/f /g /h (these are wet medium to richer sites), but no spruce on zonal sites (b & d).
**SWBSmw is converting to a grassland ecosystem from AB = driver is drought.**
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reviewing the feasibility tables for AB units moving into SWBSmw/101, focusing on the C4 and D6 site types and the shift to SBAPcp described in the issue. Compare the Sx feasibility results with the stated ecosystem conversion and determine whether the decline is expected or indicates an error; document the explanation or correction.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100