bcgov / bcgov/CCISS_Review

Pl feasibility ranking northern Rocky Mountain Trench

Open
#34 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Species Feasibility Species: Pl Type: Review
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
1
Forks
0
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Increasing Pl feasibility in the Northern Rocky Mountain Trench, SBSvk (near McBride). In all surrounding zones Pl feasibility is projected to decline. E.g. declining Pl feasibility directly to the south, SBSdh1, valley bottom, Valemount region. Pl feasibility is lost at higher elevation, e.g. ESSFwc3, as climate becomes wetter and snowier.

Change in Pl feasibility on C4 sites:
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2f3eb88d-e31d-4818-ae9c-e9dda6948e39)

**SBSvk1 – increasing Pl feasibility**
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/73e88fdb-ccf4-4e05-8c2f-419f16304852)
Starts at E3, but climatically already is a E2/E1 (feasibility is maintained, not increasing)
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7154b1a8-c0e9-4e01-ade1-0d2a14742cc0)
ICHmw3 (NW of Revelstoke) site series projected, Pl = E2 / E1
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ce193c85-9a46-48cb-9f09-1d3290395494)
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/05d321a6-6eca-4a46-88b7-1cc1135a4e88)

Just south of SBSvk1 = **SBSdh1** (valley bottom) – Pl feasibility declining
From E1 to E2
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8f03033a-8ce5-49a8-8eca-869f14b933e9)
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/93069f94-041c-4315-8dd6-160f920170d9)
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1e4cda16-810a-4ae6-985e-dd3dea1a271f)

**BGC projections for both areas are in alignment – Similar BGC futures are projected, E2 feasibility for Pl projected.
Climate models = warmer, wetter and snowier
Species Suitability Ranking – On zonal sites E3 in northern section (SBSvk) and E1 directly south (SBSdh). Northern Rocky Mountain Trench near McBride. To review.**
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/490b9d88-e25e-4209-bef2-4586754a8d5b)

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are identified. Start by comparing the SBSvk1 and SBSdh1 feasibility projections with the cited BGC and species-suitability results; done means determining whether the discrepancy is confirmed and recording the review outcome.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
data
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.