bcgov / bcgov/CCISS_Review

need a focused review of 01/101

Open
#274 12 comments 0 reactions 3 assignees Claimed by @Vcomea View on GitHub
Comment (likely bug) Release: v1.0
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
1
Forks
0
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Example of ICHmw2 - Pl is unrated/E5 on 101 sites. this doesn't make sense (it is a gap between ICHdw1-E2 and ESSFwh1-E3) and that is obvious on CCISS spatial:

![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0fda37e6-b889-487d-9da4-e733fe1d8d59).

However, on by-bec it is not obvious because the ss104 E3 rating is blended with the unrated 101.

![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/27478739-0501-412b-a2c4-fe890bf53484)

Since the bulk of forestry is done on 01/101 sites, this should be given special attention, and not contaminated with other site series.

I've opened an issue on the by-bec repo to add the ability to see 101/01 sites only. this issue can wait until that is done.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.