ESSFdh1/103 BlPl - Falsebox - Grouseberry

Moderate to steep warm aspects. Open Pl with minor amounts of Se and Bl.

Fd is shown to have high feasibility throughout the century. Lw shows increase to about 67% and then decline to about 30%. I am not sure why it is disimilar to Fd. Py shows an increasing suitability to about 65% by the end of the century. Hw shows a sharp decline beginning at about 80% in 2020. Pl is shown as being largely unfeasible (E3) right at the start which does not make sense for this unit.

Modelling seems to be off for this unit. Species that occur there today such as Pl are considered right at the beginning to be almost completely unfeasible. Fd and Py may grow on this site if they are protected from frost but that is risky. This site is too dry to support Bl Se.

The issue names the Falsebox/Grouseberry unit and reports unexpected feasibility results for Pl, Fd, Lw, Py, Hw, Bl, and Se, but mentions no files or tests. Start by locating the model inputs and output for unit ESSFdh1/103, compare the species assumptions with the observations in the report, and consider the issue done when the discrepancy is explained and the model result is corrected or documented.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.