IDFdk1/105 Pl - Pinegrass - Grouseberry - Kinnikinnick
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Upper elevations of IDFdk1 on mesic sites in transition areas to MS. Fd shows increasing feasibility which is likely correct. Py is unlikely to do well given shade-intolerance and less frost hardiness so that should not be increasing with time. Lw (introduced species) shows it doing moderately better over time - I think it should be similar to feasibility of Fd. Pl shows decline over time which does not make sense to me. Sx is not likely to be feasible - too dry. At is likely correct and may be present. Bl should not be present - too warm and dry.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the IDFdk1/105 feasibility data for Pl, Py, Lw, Sx, At, and Bl. Compare those entries with the stated site conditions and determine the expected time trends and presence or absence; done when the feasibility values reflect the review.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100