Ba coastal elevation transect (increasing to declining feasibility)

The pattern of change in Ba feasibility goes from increasing to decreasing, maintained then expansion as you move inland and upwards in elevation. This pattern spans the Central to North Coast.
o Increase = CWHvh2 projected future BGC climate CWHvh1, Ba shifts from E3 to E2.
o Decrease = in the lower portion of CWHvm1, CWHvm2 and MHmm1, future climate is CWHvh2, Ba shifts from E1 to E2/E3 (CWHvh2 split between many different site series, 01a, 01b, 01c, 04a, 04b).
o Maintained = across much of the mid elevation maritime subzones.
o Expansion = into the MHmmp (parkland) and lower portion of CMA.
o At the lower elevations there are not good future climate analogs. - see issue #8

To review this pattern. Main issue is the increasing feasibility at lowest elevation. Does this make sense?


Start by reviewing the Ba feasibility pattern described for the Central to North Coast, including the elevation and future-climate transitions listed in the issue and the two attached images. Compare the lowest-elevation increase with the lower-elevation analog concerns in issue #8; done means determining whether that pattern is valid and documenting any needed correction.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.