是否实验过m2_hat用linear频谱计算误差呢?
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 36.9k
- Forks
- 5.2k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
您好,有注意到用了postnet处理mel为linear,但是看训练过程,并没有用linear的频谱,而是用mel的频谱。
问下是否实验过m2_hat用linear频谱计算误差呢?
如果有实验过,能否谈一下结果如何呢?
下面贴上loss的计算:
# Backward pass
m1_loss = F.mse_loss(m1_hat, mels) + F.l1_loss(m1_hat, mels)
m2_loss = F.mse_loss(m2_hat, mels)
stop_loss = F.binary_cross_entropy(stop_pred, stop)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
The issue provides only the loss snippet, including m1_hat, m2_hat, mels, and stop_pred; no file or test is named. Start by locating the training loss implementation and determine whether m2_hat can be compared with a linear spectrum instead of mels. Done would require an agreed experiment and documented results.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python, pytorch
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100