bSI-InfraRoom / bSI-InfraRoom/IFC-Specification

`IfcComplementaryData` - should it be declared by `IfcProject`?

Open
#644 1 comment 0 reactions 3 assignees Claimed by @pjanck View on GitHub
documentation general usage IFC Tunnel
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
27
Forks
24
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

It seems natural to have them declared in the `IfcProject`, similar to how `IfcTypeProduct`s are declared.

Other options are of course imaginable.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.