bSI-InfraRoom / bSI-InfraRoom/IFC-Specification
handling of long composed enumerators
Open
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 27
- Forks
- 24
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
when looking into the proposed additions from INFRA/RAIL there is a mix of concatination and "_" separation of long terms,
e.g. in IfcDiscreteAccessoryTypeEnum
POINTMACHINEMOUNTINGDEVICE
POINT_MACHINE_LOCKING_DEVICE
RAIL_MECHANICAL_EQUIPMENT
the prefered way in IFC had been without "_", although it was never 100% obeyed and there are several existing cases with "_". But adding similar concepts, as above, sometimes with and sometime without an "_" to the same enumeration is strange. The usage style should at least be consistent within one enumeration.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.