Record Support in DynamoDBContext
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 140
- Forks
- 891
- Avg merge
- 21h 51m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
### Describe the feature
Currently `DynamoDBContext` supports class types for the object model type parameter but does not seem to work with record types. It would be great if it would support record types as well.
### Use Case
Using record types with DynamoDBContext.
### Proposed Solution
_No response_
### Other Information
_No response_
### Acknowledgements
- [ ] I may be able to implement this feature request
- [ ] This feature might incur a breaking change
### AWS .NET SDK and/or Package version used
AWSSDK.DynamoDBv2
### Targeted .NET Platform
.NET 6 and up
### Operating System and version
Any
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by inspecting DynamoDBContext's handling of class types and the object model type parameter in the AWS SDK for .NET. Reproduce the reported behavior with a .NET 6 record type, then determine the expected support and verify that record types can be used with DynamoDBContext without breaking existing class support.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- aws, csharp
- Domain
- databases
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100