L2 Constructs for AWS Elemental MediaConnect
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 572
- Forks
- 108
- Avg merge
- 2m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
## Description
Short description of the proposed feature.
## Roles
| Role | User
|---------------------|------------------------------
| Proposed by | @jamiepmullan
| Author(s) | @jamiepmullan
| API Bar Raiser |
| Stakeholders |
> See [RFC Process](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk-rfcs#rfc-process) for details
## Workflow
- [x] Tracking issue created (label: `status/proposed`)
- [ ] API bar raiser assigned (ping us at [#aws-cdk-rfcs](https://cdk-dev.slack.com/archives/C025ZFGMUCD) if needed)
- [ ] Kick off meeting
- [ ] RFC pull request submitted (label: `status/review`)
- [ ] Community reach out (via Slack and/or Twitter)
- [ ] API signed-off (label `status/api-approved` applied to pull request)
- [ ] Final comments period (label: `status/final-comments-period`)
- [ ] Approved and merged (label: `status/approved`)
- [ ] Execution plan submitted (label: `status/planning`)
- [ ] Plan approved and merged (label: `status/implementing`)
- [ ] Implementation complete (label: `status/done`)
---
> Author is responsible to progress the RFC according to this checklist, and
apply the relevant labels to this issue so that the RFC table in README gets
updated.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the RFC Process linked in the issue and use the AWS Elemental MediaConnect proposal as the entry point. The issue is complete only when the RFC advances through the listed API, review, approval, planning, and implementation checklist.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- aws
- Domain
- cloud, infrastructure
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100