proposal+titleRFC

## Description

Short description of the proposed feature.

## Roles

| Role | User
|---------------------|------------------------------
| Proposed by | @alias
| Author(s) | @alias, @alias, @alias
| API Bar Raiser | @alias
| Stakeholders | @alias, @alias, @alias

> See [RFC Process](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk-rfcs#rfc-process) for details

## Workflow

- [x] Tracking issue created (label: `status/proposed`)
- [ ] API bar raiser assigned (ping us at [#aws-cdk-rfcs](https://cdk-dev.slack.com/archives/C025ZFGMUCD) if needed)
- [ ] Kick off meeting
- [ ] RFC pull request submitted (label: `status/review`)
- [ ] Community reach out (via Slack and/or Twitter)
- [ ] API signed-off (label `status/api-approved` applied to pull request)
- [ ] Final comments period (label: `status/final-comments-period`)
- [ ] Approved and merged (label: `status/approved`)
- [ ] Execution plan submitted (label: `status/planning`)
- [ ] Plan approved and merged (label: `status/implementing`)
- [ ] Implementation complete (label: `status/done`)

---

> Author is responsible to progress the RFC according to this checklist, and
apply the relevant labels to this issue so that the RFC table in README gets
updated.

Start with the RFC Process linked in the issue and the repository README, which the checklist says is updated from labels. The current body does not identify a feature, implementation entry point, or tests; clarify the proposal and roles, then follow the listed workflow through an RFC pull request and the appropriate status labels.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.