(aws-cdk): use either vitest or Node.js Test Runner for testing instead of jest

### Describe the feature

I followed [Tutorial: Create your first AWS CDK app](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cdk/v2/guide/hello-world.html) and ran the following command

```console
$ hello-cdk> cdk --version
2.1031.2 (build 779352d)

$ hello-cdk> cdk init app --language typescript
...
```

It uses `jest` by default which requires additional dependency `ts-jest` for setup, as well as explicit installation of `@types/jest`
```console
$ grep jest package.json
"test": "jest",
"@types/jest": "^29.5.14",
"jest": "^29.7.0",
"ts-jest": "^29.2.5",
```

### Use Case

Over the years, the [vitest](https://vitest.dev/) seems to be becoming popular test framework.

There are [several comparisons](https://www.google.com/search?q=jest+vs+vitest) online, and [npm trends](https://npmtrends.com/jest-vs-vitest) shows vitest growing faster than jest.

If cdk init project uses vitest, the CDK customers will benefit from improved performance. Vitest has first-class support for TypeScript, so the types and additional dependencies are not required to be installed.

Even better, the CDK project can just use [Node.js test runner](https://nodejs.org/api/test.html) instead. It should have enough features which CDK customers might need for their test setup.

### Proposed Solution

Use [vitest](https://vitest.dev/) or [Node.js Test Runner](https://nodejs.org/api/test.html) instead of jest for unit testing.

### Other Information

npm trends jest vs vitest

### Acknowledgements

- [ ] I may be able to implement this feature request
- [ ] This feature might incur a breaking change

### CDK version used

2.1031.2

### Environment details (OS name and version, etc.)

All