aws-samples / aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents
feat(adapters): GitLab integration (Bitbucket optional)
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 143
- Forks
- 46
- Avg merge
- 3d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 20
Description
**Context:** ROADMAP.md → Additional git providers
---
## Component
API or orchestration
## Describe the feature
**GitLab** (and optionally Bitbucket) as git providers: same workflow model, provider-specific API adapters for clone, PR/MR, webhooks, and reviews.
## Use case
Teams on GitLab cannot use ABCA without GitHub. Multi-provider support broadens adoption while keeping workflow YAML portable.
## Proposed solution
1. `GitProvider` adapter interface; GitHub implementation refactored as reference.
2. GitLab: MR creation, pipeline status webhooks, token/OAuth via Token Vault (#249).
3. Blueprint `git_provider: github | gitlab`.
4. CLI onboarding for GitLab repos.
5. Bitbucket as stretch goal / follow-up.
## Other information
- Identity pattern from **Per-repo GitHub credentials** (#50, #249) should generalize.
- Design context: `docs/design/ARCHITECTURE.md`, `docs/design/INPUT_GATEWAY.md`.
- [x] This might be a breaking change
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with ROADMAP.md, docs/design/ARCHITECTURE.md, and docs/design/INPUT_GATEWAY.md, then review the existing GitHub implementation and related issues #50 and #249. Clarify the adapter and credential boundaries before implementation; done would require an agreed scope for GitLab provider support across merge requests, webhooks, reviews, blueprints, and CLI onboarding.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github, gitlab, typescript
- Domain
- api, authentication, backend-api-design, cli
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100