Proposal to archive this repository
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 5
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
As part of the 2026 community goals (more details here: https://github.com/asyncapi/community/issues/3495), we conducted an audit of all repositories. The summary of the findings can be found here: https://github.com/asyncapi/community/issues/3495#issuecomment-4681625773.
As discussed by @AceTheCreator @thulieblack @derberg in the following comments:
* https://github.com/asyncapi/training/issues/65#issuecomment-4704822079
* https://github.com/asyncapi/training/issues/65#issuecomment-4716759743
* https://github.com/asyncapi/training/issues/65#issuecomment-4717550324
and also here:
* https://github.com/asyncapi/community/issues/3495#issuecomment-4722354038
we are proposing to archive this repository.
I am opening this issue to gather the views and approval of the code owners of this repository.
Tagging all code owners for their feedback and approval.
@alequetzalli @quetzalliwrites
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reading the linked community audit and the referenced training and community comments to understand the archival proposal. Then review the code owners named in the issue and gather their feedback; done means the proposal is approved and the repository is archived.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100