RUF002 offers unrelated substitution for unicode quotation mark

With ruff 0.0.261, using the "RUF" rule, the following docstring:
```python
"""All the account’s items"""
```
produces the following error:

```
RUF002 [*] Docstring contains ambiguous unicode character `’` (did you mean ```?)
```

The Unicode character in the comment is U+2019 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK which is drawn from upper right to lower left. The suggested substitution is the backtick character which is drawn from upper left to lower right - this character is not semantically related to the Unicode character.

This suggestion is automatically applied when `--fix` is specified, producing:
```python
"""All the account`s items"""
```

Is this to avoid messing with docstring quotes by not substituting the single quote character `'`? In that case I would suggest not making this Unicode character autofixable at all, rather than substituting an unrelated character.

Start by reproducing the RUF002 diagnostic on the documented Python docstring with --fix, then inspect the RUF002 rule and its autofix behavior. Done means the rule no longer suggests or applies an unrelated replacement for U+2019 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK, with coverage for the reported example.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.