(🎁) preserve node line of `noqa` comments when formatting

```py
dict(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa=1) # noqa: C408
```

# after format (fail)
```py
dict(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa=1
) # noqa: C408
```

ruff is doing the `check`ing of this `noqa`, ruff is also the one doing the `format`ing, so it would seem logical that ruff use the `check` information to keep the `noqa` on the right line
```py
dict( # noqa: C408
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa=1
)
```

# Additionally

this isn't exclusive to `format` as changes from `check` can also conflict, see #12179

related:
- #8232
- #12179

Run the provided Python reproduction with Ruff's check and format workflows, then read the handling of noqa diagnostics and formatted line changes. Compare the related issues #8232 and #12179; done means the noqa remains on the line checked by Ruff after formatting and check-induced changes do not create the same conflict.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.