aspect-build / aspect-build/rules_buildx
[Bug]: Usage of the rules wrong at release page
- Dominant language
- Starlark
- Stars
- 19
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
### What happened?
Here pointed to use `rules_buildx` https://github.com/aspect-build/rules_buildx/releases/tag/v0.0.1
but in fact you should use `aspect_rules_buildx`
```
bazel_dep(name = "aspect_rules_buildx")
archive_override(
module_name = "aspect_rules_buildx",
integrity = "sha256-PVRQaniGFgIAiHbjM9fOavMVdY3HJCFHDKzl1+O3g+g=",
patch_strip = 1,
strip_prefix = "rules_buildx-0.0.1",
urls = ["https://github.com/aspect-build/rules_buildx/archive/refs/tags/v0.0.1.tar.gz"],
)
```
### Version
Development (host) and target OS/architectures:
Output of `bazel --version`:
Version of the Aspect rules, or other relevant rules from your
`WORKSPACE` or `MODULE.bazel` file:
Language(s) and/or frameworks involved:
### How to reproduce
```shell
```
### Any other information?
_No response_
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start at the v0.0.1 release page linked in the issue and compare its rules usage with the provided MODULE.bazel snippet. Update the incorrect `rules_buildx` reference to `aspect_rules_buildx`; done means the release page consistently shows the corrected module name and example.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 58/100