arkavo-org / arkavo-org/VRMMetalKit
Create Automated Performance Benchmark Suite
- Dominant language
- Swift
- Stars
- 6
- Forks
- 2
- Avg merge
- 18h 51m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 26
Description
# Create Automated Performance Benchmark Suite
**Labels:** low, testing, performance
## Problem
No automated performance tests exist to track regressions or validate performance claims in the README.
## Current State
- No automated performance tests
- Performance claims in README not backed by tests
- No baseline performance metrics
- Risk of performance regressions going unnoticed
## Impact
- Cannot track performance regressions
- Performance claims unverified
- Difficult to measure optimization impact
- No performance baselines for comparison
## Suggested Solution
### 1. Add XCTest Performance Tests
```swift
func testRenderingPerformance() throws {
let model = try loadTestModel()
let renderer = VRMRenderer(device: device)
renderer.loadModel(model)
measure(metrics: [XCTClockMetric(), XCTMemoryMetric()]) {
// Render 100 frames
for _ in 0..<100 {
renderer.draw(in: view, commandBuffer: commandBuffer,
renderPassDescriptor: descriptor)
}
}
}
```
### 2. Measure Key Metrics
- Frame time (average, p95, p99)
- GPU time
- Memory usage
- Draw call count
- Triangle count
### 3. Establish Baseline Metrics
Document expected performance for different model complexities.
### 4. Run in CI/CD
Add performance tests to CI pipeline to catch regressions.
### 5. Generate Performance Reports
Create automated reports comparing against baselines.
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Performance tests for core operations
- [ ] Baseline metrics established
- [ ] Tests run in CI/CD pipeline
- [ ] Performance reports generated
- [ ] README claims validated by tests
- [ ] Regression detection automated
**Priority:** Low
**Effort:** Medium (1-2 weeks)
Contributor guide
Research direction
No file paths are identified. Start by locating the existing rendering entry points, the VRMRenderer usage, XCTest targets, README performance claims, and CI/CD configuration. Done means core-operation performance tests, baseline metrics, CI execution, regression reports, and validated README claims are all covered.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- swift
- Domain
- ci-cd, performance, testing
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100