aristanetworks / aristanetworks/purescript-backend-optimizer
allow to write alternative implementations in config file
- Dominant language
- PureScript
- Stars
- 216
- Forks
- 24
- Avg merge
- 8m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
lean has `implemented_by` https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/blob/1f9bba9d398e207ebbb62696b84502ad764d39dc/src/Init/Data/Array/Basic.lean#L533
and I would like to implement optimizations like this https://github.com/purescript/purescript-json/pull/9
proposal
```purs
module PureScript.Backend.Optimizer.Directives.Defaults where
defaultDirectives :: String
defaultDirectives =
"""
...
JSON.fromBoolean implemented_by unsafeCoerce
JSON.fromInt implemented_by unsafeCoerce
JSON.fromString implemented_by unsafeCoerce
JSON.fromJArray implemented_by unsafeCoerce
JSON.fromJObject implemented_by unsafeCoerce
JSON.Array.signleton implemented_by unsafeCoerce [unsafeCoerce x]
JSON.Internals.toArray implemented_by unsafeCoerce
JSON.Internals.fromArray implemented_by unsafeCoerce
JSON.Internals.empty implemented_by unsafeCoerce []
"""
```
Alternative - implement js backend for lean :)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with the referenced Lean implemented_by declaration and the purescript-json pull request, then inspect PureScript.Backend.Optimizer.Directives.Defaults and how defaultDirectives is consumed. Done requires an agreed configuration syntax and behavior for alternative implementations, along with the corresponding backend support and verification.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100