argoproj / argoproj/argo-workflows
PVC Pool: cheap shared volumes
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 17k
- Forks
- 3.7k
- Avg merge
- 1d 20h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 138
Description
# Summary
PVCs are expensive and there maybe limits on providers to the total number create.
# Use Cases
Allow users to define a pool of PVCs which are allocated to workflows.
---
**Message from the maintainers**:
Impacted by this bug? Give it a 👍. We prioritise the issues with the most 👍.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by tracing how Argo Workflows currently create and attach PVCs; the issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Clarify the pool lifecycle, allocation and release rules, provider limits, and workflow-facing configuration before implementation. Done means users can define a PVC pool and workflows can safely receive shared volumes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go, kubernetes
- Domain
- devops
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100