Wrong conversion of character n to 0pt.

### Description

In most of the equations that have f(n), g(n) are represented as 0pt.Its safe to say wherever 0pt occurs as a continuous text string should ideally be n . There seems to be some specific conversion issue for the character n in f(n), g(n) in this paper.

https://arxiv.org/html/2310.17813

Check this paper and find the text 0pt in the html version. All these in the original pdf actually occur as "n" as in f(n), g(n) and the like.

### (Optional:) Please add any files, screenshots, or other information here.

_No response_

### (Required) What is this issue most closely related to? Select one.

Formula

### Internal issue ID

1b86b1a2-f84a-40a6-823a-200c6162a781

### Paper URL

https://arxiv.org/html/2310.17813

### Browser

Firefox/151.0

### Device Type

Desktop

Open the linked arXiv HTML paper and compare every continuous-text occurrence of “0pt” with the original PDF, especially in f(n) and g(n). Trace the HTML formula or character-conversion entry point responsible; done means the affected occurrences render as “n” while unrelated “0pt” text is unchanged.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.