Experimental HTML pages returning incorrect article metadata to zotero reference manager extension

### Description

When using the experimental HTML view and attempting to save a paper to Zotero using the Zotero connector extension for Firefox, some subset of the paper's references are retrieved by DOI instead. The paper's metadata is retrieved correctly when using the extension from the paper's abstract page.

I understand there may simply be an incompatibility between the HTML formatting and the external extension, but wanted to draw attention to this in case there is a way the formatting could be improved to ensure consistency with the information that can be extracted from abstract pages. Aside from the general mild inconvenience, I do frequently navigate by voice for accessibility reasons and this behaviour would certainly be frustrating to use in that capacity. I feel it is likely to cause confusion for screen-reader users as well, especially in light of the difference in behaviour between the experimental HTML pages and the main abstract pages.

If there is no change from within the experimental HTML conversion that may improve compatibility, perhaps a notice somewhere that reference managers are more likely to retrieve correct paper data from the abstract page would suffice.

Cheers!

### (Optional:) Please add any files, screenshots, or other information here.

1. Using the Zotero connector extension in Firefox while accessing an arXiv experimental HTML page, click the extension to Save to Zotero
2. A pop-up will appear with a list of potential articles retrieved by DOI; the current paper has never been in this list in my experience

### (Required) What is this issue most closely related to? Select one.

References

### Internal issue ID

b04b2235-795e-46ff-ae17-e8cfbcd8de84

### Paper URL

https://arxiv.org/html/2507.01931v1

### Browser

Firefox/150.0

### Device Type

Windows 10 Desktop PC

Reproduce the behavior at the reported arXiv HTML URL with the Zotero connector in Firefox, then compare it with the paper's abstract page. Trace the generated HTML metadata and reference markup used by the experimental page; done means either confirming compatible paper metadata extraction or documenting the limitation and adding the suggested notice if formatting cannot address it.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.