Surprisingly low-resolution images of figures, from PDF source
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 42
- Forks
- 40
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
### Description
The HTML version of my paper generally looks good. However, I'm surprised how few pixels you use for the figures -- for instance this figure, which is about 70% of page width in the PDF, is hard to decode:
https://arxiv.org/html/2602.23324v1#A1.F1
I'd suggest 2x or 4x the resolution would be much better, while still loading quite fast.
### (Optional:) Please add any files, screenshots, or other information here.
The image itself is here: https://arxiv.org/html/2602.23324v1/x5.png size 278×159 pixels
Screenshot of the PDF for comparison, the figure itself is a PDF:
### (Required) What is this issue most closely related to? Select one.
Figures
### Internal issue ID
7c3e8623-4648-4baf-af22-6ae3e407f847
### Paper URL
https://arxiv.org/html/2602.23324v1
### Browser
Safari/605.1.15
### Device Type
[Set automatically. Do not modify.]
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the HTML paper URL and compare figure x5.png with the linked PDF screenshot. Trace how the figure is produced and sized in the HTML rendering path; done means the figure is served at roughly 2x or 4x the current resolution while remaining acceptably fast to load.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- frontend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100