Bibliography items do not match PDF style/appearance

I don't know whether this is a design decision, or an issue specific to my platform (Firefox on Ubuntu.) But in the HTML view on ArXiV, I do not see any numbers displayed next to the footnotes. This makes it very difficult to tell for sure which footnote goes with any given reference in the paper. I recognize that the footnote numbers in the paper are links, which in principle take me to the corresponding footnotes at the bottom. So I should be able to tell by clicking the number, and then observing which footnote lands at the top of the viewport. However, browser programmatic scrolling tends to be a somewhat glitchy thing, so I don't really trust it to land in the right place; and, ironically, the "experimental HTML" banner, at the top of the page, actually covers up the selected footnote when clicking the link to scroll to it. (This is a universal and inherent issue with using "position: fixed" for top-bar UI elements like this. It's very stupid that HTML/CSS still has this issue in 2025, but here we are.) So without footnote numbers, it's hard for me to verify I've found the right footnote, without downloading the PDF to double-check.

Reproduce the missing footnote numbers in the arXiv HTML view using Firefox on Ubuntu, then inspect the rendered footnotes and the fixed experimental HTML banner. Done means bibliography or footnote references visibly match the PDF and selecting a footnote does not leave it hidden behind the top banner.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.