Support for copernicus.cls

### Description

This may be due to the copernicus template, mandated by the journal/publisher, which requires the introduction and discussion sections to be placed in their pre-defined \introduction{text} and \discussion{tex} commands, rather than using generic \section{Introduction} and \section{Discussion} declarations.

PS --- this issue is mostly to point out that there may be many "edge cases" with unusual class files in submitted papers, which may not always be in the authors' control.

### (Optional:) Please add any files, screenshots, or other information here.

_No response_

### (Required) What is this issue most closely related to? Select one.

Other

### Internal issue ID

859925d8-f607-41f8-a3b4-48c0769cc63b

### Paper URL

https://arxiv.org/html/2012.15130v4

### Browser

Safari/605.1.15

### Device Type

Desktop

Start with the paper at https://arxiv.org/html/2012.15130v4 and inspect how its copernicus.cls-specific \introduction and \discussion commands appear in the rendered HTML. Determine the expected handling for these publisher-defined commands and verify that the introduction and discussion sections are represented correctly without regressing generic sections.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.