\pdfcomment{abstract text} not handled (zref-savepos.sty)
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 42
- Forks
- 40
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
### Description
Dear team,
Thank you for the useful Latex to html conversion.
For example in bibtex entries, "note = {\pdfcomment{abstract text}}" can be used for quick and convenient access to the reference's abstract, on hover or click, for the pdf-version, via a pop-up window. If the pdf viewer supports it, which the better ones do.
Your conversion includes the abstract text --- which could be fine, you don't have to use pop-ups. But it also leaves '\pdfcomment' in. It furthermore has no subject, e.g. 'Abstract' (set in the preamble), which also might be fine though.
E.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03685 uses pdfcomment this way, with your conversion at: https://arxiv.org/html/2404.03685v4
Cordially,
Daniel Vallstrom
### (Optional:) Please add any files, screenshots, or other information here.
All files and links are at:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03685
### (Required) What is this issue most closely related to? Select one.
Other
### Internal issue ID
7c844334-c4d8-4a98-beb6-06b5478f8cda
### Paper URL
https://arxiv.org/html/2404.03685v4
### Browser
Firefox/129.0
### Device Type
na
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reproducing the rendering shown at https://arxiv.org/html/2404.03685v4 and trace how the conversion handles \pdfcomment in the referenced BibTeX note. Done means the abstract text remains available in the HTML without the literal \pdfcomment command, while any intended subject behavior is clarified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- latex
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100