Position of subfigures changed making positional references nonsensical

### Description

In my LaTex document I have a figure that consists of 6 subfigures. I do not label each subfigure separately with (a), (b), etc., instead I just refer to the (top), (middle), and (bottom) rows, because my subfigures are arranged in a 2x3 grid. In the HTML view all subfigures go one after another, the labels (a), (b), etc. are added, but my figure caption now does not make sense, because there is no longer any (middle) row.

### (Optional:) Please add any files, screenshots, or other information here.

_No response_

### (Required) What is this issue most closely related to? Select one.

Figures

### Internal issue ID

134fc155-69a6-4828-b51b-695ca98eeab0

### Paper URL

https://arxiv.org/html/2304.02011v3

### Browser

Firefox/126.0

### Device Type

Desktop

Start with the paper at https://arxiv.org/html/2304.02011v3 and compare the source figure's 2x3 subfigure arrangement with its HTML rendering. Trace the figure conversion path and determine how row structure and positional references are represented; done means the HTML presentation preserves meaningful top, middle, and bottom row references.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.