approvals / approvals/ApprovalTests.Ruby
Some example metadata is wrong/missing (RSpec integration)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 231
- Forks
- 45
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
A bunch of the metadata on the example points to the DSL module rather than the place where the verify is being called, since specify() is being called in the DSL module. I think it should be possible to bind the call to specify to the callers context.
Some of the issues this causes are:
- The approvals don't register
:filtered => true, e.g. if you try to run just certain examples or groups. - The formatter for an example group points to the
DSLfile rather than the spec file
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by examining the RSpec integration around specify() in the DSL module and how verify is called. Trace how example metadata is assigned, then confirm that approvals expose filtered=true when appropriate and that example-group formatters point to the spec file rather than the DSL file.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ruby
- Domain
- testing
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100