apollographql / apollographql/vscode-graphql

Allow different schemas for different file paths

Open
#76 0 comments 2 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
78
Forks
23
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Example use case:

Next.js app where the API routes can call the graphql API as admins vs the frontend that can call the API as authenticated users.

Example config from graphql-code-generator config which allows a similar behaviour:

module.exports = {
generates: {
'./types/codegen/index.ts': {
schema: [
{
[`https${process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL}`]: {
headers: {
'X-Hasura-Admin-Secret': XXXXXX,
'X-Hasura-Role': 'User',
},
},
},
],
documents: [
'./pages/**/*.tsx',
'./components/**/*.tsx',
'./utils/**/*.tsx',
],
},
'./types/codegen/admin-generated.ts': {

schema: [
{
[`https${process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL}`]: {
headers: {
'X-Hasura-Admin-Secret': XXXXXX,
'X-Hasura-Role': 'Admin',
},
},
},
],
documents: ['./pages/api/**/*.ts'],
},
},
};

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Jira Task](https://apollographql.atlassian.net/browse/NEBULA-1335) by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

The issue provides a GraphQL Code Generator configuration example with separate schemas and document globs for frontend and admin paths. No repository files, tests, entry points, or acceptance criteria are named; first locate the extension's schema and file-path configuration, then establish how separate schemas should be selected and tested.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
graphql, typescript
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.