apollographql / apollographql/federation

federation: resolveType of extended interface without knowledge of concrete type

Open
#377 3 comments 9 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
725
Forks
276
Avg merge
1h 47m
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

Our existing services and clients utilize the node interface for object resolution and I haven't been able to figure out a way to implement this with federation

Given the following services:

**Product Service**
```
const typeDefs = gql`
interface Node {
id: ID!
}

type Product implements Node @key(fields: "id") {
id: ID!
status: String
}
`

const resolvers = {
Product: {
__resolveReference({ id }) {
return { id, status: 'in_stock' }
},
},
}
```

**Node Resolution Service**
```
const typeDefs = gql`
interface Node @key(fields: "id") @extends {
id: ID! @external
}

extend type Query {
node(id: ID!): Node
}
`

const resolvers = {
Node: {
__resolveType(object) {
return object.__typename
},
},
Query: {
node(_, args) {
const [__typename, decodedId] = Base64.decode(args.id).split('-')
return { __typename, id: decodedId }
},
},
}
```

I am unable to lookup a product via the node field with its encoded id. Intuitively, this makes sense because the node resolution service is unaware of any types returned from `__resolveType`. How feasible would it be for `__resolveType` to allow for arbitrary types if it's extended?

Or am I thinking about this problem in the wrong way - have there been any other ideas for implementing the node interface with federation and gateway?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start with the federated Node interface and Query.node examples in the issue, then trace how the gateway handles __resolveType for an extended interface. A useful outcome would be a documented, reproducible answer on whether arbitrary concrete types are supported and what implementation path or alternative is expected.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
typescript
Domain
api, backend-api-design
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.