[bug] time boundary manager incorrect handling non-overlap realtime/offline table segments
Open
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 6.1k
- Forks
- 1.5k
- Avg merge
- 1d 21h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 189
Description
one should use all offline table segments, instead of -1 day if realtime table doesn't exist or there's a gap between the realtime and offline table segments in terms of time overlap-ness
Contributor guide
Research direction
Locate the time boundary manager and inspect how it handles realtime and offline table segments. Reproduce cases where the realtime table is absent or has a time gap with offline segments; done means all applicable offline segments are used instead of defaulting to -1 day.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- databases
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100