apache / apache/pinot

Replication vs ReplicasPerPartition

Open
#8,804 9 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Java
Stars
6.1k
Forks
1.5k
Avg merge
1d 21h
Merged PRs (30d)
189

Description

The question on what is the difference between `replication` vs `replicasPerPartition` frequently comes up. Opening this issue to track:

- Could these be unified to a single config `replication` that applies to both `OFFLINE` as well as `REALTIME` tables? We can still honor `replicasPerPartition` for backward compatibility.
- If there is we need both, could we document the reasoning behind it?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start by comparing the existing `replication` and `replicasPerPartition` configuration behavior for OFFLINE and REALTIME tables. The issue does not name files or tests, so locate their configuration definitions and usages first. Done means either one unified setting with backward compatibility, or clear documentation explaining why both settings remain.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
java
Domain
databases, distributed-systems
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.