Will use Netty's BytebufAllocator improve the performance of allocation in Pekko?
Open
- Dominant language
- Scala
- Stars
- 1.6k
- Forks
- 211
- Avg merge
- 1d 6h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 89
Description
Current pekko has a DirectByteBufferPool, but Netty has a more complicated BytebufAllocator, with pooled or adaptive type.
Not sure if it's a good idea to make use of Netty's BytebufAllocator and then expose the internalNioBuffer to pekko.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.