apache / apache/pekko-persistence-jdbc
JdbcSnapshotStore ignores minSequenceNr and minTimestamp from SnapshotSelectionCriteria
- Dominant language
- Scala
- Stars
- 26
- Forks
- 26
- Avg merge
- 19h 52m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 17
Description
Suggested by Claude.
This issue does not exist in pekko-persistence-r2dbc.
I wonder if the pekko-persistence-jdbc component has been quietly sidelined in favour of pekko-persistence-r2dbc.
Pekko's SnapshotSelectionCriteria has four fields: maxSequenceNr, maxTimestamp, minSequenceNr, and minTimestamp. The JdbcSnapshotStore in pekko-persistence-jdbc pattern-matches on only the first two (max bounds) and silently discards the min bounds. This affects both loadAsync and deleteAsync.
Affected file: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/pekko/persistence/jdbc/snapshot/JdbcSnapshotStore.scala
Current behavior (lines 68-78 for load, 92-102 for delete):
// loadAsync - only uses maxSequenceNr and maxTimestamp
criteria match {
case SnapshotSelectionCriteria(Long.MaxValue, Long.MaxValue, _, _) => // min fields discarded via _
snapshotDao.latestSnapshot(persistenceId)
case SnapshotSelectionCriteria(Long.MaxValue, maxTimestamp, _, _) =>
snapshotDao.snapshotForMaxTimestamp(persistenceId, maxTimestamp)
case SnapshotSelectionCriteria(maxSequenceNr, Long.MaxValue, _, _)
snapshotDao.snapshotForMaxSequenceNr(persistenceId, maxSequenceN
case SnapshotSelectionCriteria(maxSequenceNr, maxTimestamp, _, _) =>
snapshotDao.snapshotForMaxSequenceNrAndMaxTimestamp(persistenceId, maxSequenceNr, maxTimestamp)
case _ => Future.successful(None)
}
The _, _ wildcards explicitly ignore minSequenceNr and minTimestamp. The DAO methods and SQL queries have no parameters for min bounds at all.
Impact:
- loadAsync may return a snapshot that is below the caller's minimumamp
- deleteAsync may delete snapshots that fall below the minimum boundr intended to keep
- Any Pekko application relying on min-bounds filtering (e.g., SnapsquenceNr, maxTimestamp, minSequenceNr = 5, minTimestamp = ...)) gets
incorrect results
Note: The Pekko TCK (SnapshotStoreSpec) does not test min bounds, so this bug passes CI undetected.
---
Plan for Changes
Files to modify (7 files):
1. SnapshotDao.scala — Add two new methods with default implementatility:
- snapshotForCriteria(persistenceId, maxSequenceNr, maxTimestamp, minSequenceNr, minTimestamp) — defaults to existing max-only methods
- deleteByCriteria(persistenceId, maxSequenceNr, maxTimestamp, minSequenceNr, minTimestamp) — defaults to existing max-only methods
2. SnapshotQueries.scala (new schema) — Add query builders that cond filters (sequenceNumber >= minSequenceNr when > 0, created >=minTimestamp when > 0) alongside the existing max-bounds filters.
3. DefaultSnapshotDao.scala — Override the new methods to use the new query builders.
4. legacy/SnapshotQueries.scala — Same query builder additions for t
5. legacy/ByteArraySnapshotDao.scala — Override the new methods for legacy DAO.
6. JdbcSnapshotStore.scala — Replace the pattern-matching dispatch ic with direct calls to snapshotForCriteria and deleteByCriteria,passing all four bounds from the criteria.
7. JdbcSnapshotStoreSpec.scala — Add directional tests:
- loadAsync with minSequenceNr excludes snapshots below the min
- loadAsync with minTimestamp excludes snapshots below the min
- deleteAsync with minSequenceNr preserves snapshots below the min
- deleteAsync with minTimestamp preserves snapshots below the min
Binary compatibility:
- New methods on SnapshotDao trait are concrete with default implementations → binary compatible (Java 8+ default interface methods)
- Existing methods remain unchanged
- MiMa should pass cleanly
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with core/src/main/scala/org/apache/pekko/persistence/jdbc/snapshot/JdbcSnapshotStore.scala and trace the SnapshotDao, DefaultSnapshotDao, SnapshotQueries, legacy/SnapshotQueries, and legacy/ByteArraySnapshotDao paths. Run JdbcSnapshotStoreSpec.scala, then add coverage showing loadAsync respects minimum sequence and timestamp bounds and deleteAsync preserves snapshots below them.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- scala, sql
- Domain
- backend, databases
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 64/100