apache / apache/parquet-format
Document INT96 timestamps
- Dominant language
- Thrift
- Stars
- 2.6k
- Forks
- 508
- Avg merge
- 2d 8h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Description
Although considered as deprecated, they should be documented as the format is quite special.
**Reporter**: [Uwe Korn](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=uwe) / @xhochy
**Assignee**: [Uwe Korn](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=uwe) / @xhochy
#### PRs and other links:
- [GitHub Pull Request #49](https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/49)
**Note**: *This issue was originally created as [PARQUET-861](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-861). Please see the [migration documentation](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2502) for further details.*
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reviewing the INT96 timestamp format and the migration documentation linked in the issue, then inspect GitHub Pull Request #49 for the existing work. Done means the special, deprecated format is documented clearly in the project documentation without leaving the scope described by the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100