Do we want Rules to be anonymous always, with no possibility to name them?

As part of the work on nuking the Activator and thus refactoring the way we fire triggers and match rules to them it became quite obvious that rules as they currently are implemented are just a name for the connection between a trigger and an action.
- They don't provide much value as they are 1:1 bindings anyway, which might as well be implemented as a connection between trigger and action, just without giving it a name
- They are activatable/deactivatable, but imho it makes more sense to have triggers activatable/deactivatable, as that would actually pause the stream of events to that trigger. To replace rules deactivating behaviour one might just remove the connection between triggers and actions.

Without rules, the steps to take on the CLI will roughly stay the same, but you don't need to name the connection and as we all know, "Naming things" is one of the hardest problems in IT.

**Edit:** The discussion has drifted away a bit from my initial thoughts. Title has been renamed by @rabbah for that purpose. Some of the comments might not fit the title anymore.