Actions list to improve NuttX quality and reliability
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 4k
- Forks
- 1.7k
- Avg merge
- 1d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 237
Description
### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
These are some of suggested actions we need to take to improve NuttX quality:
1. **Automated Test and CI Integration** (only will cover some corner cases)
2. **Test Coverage Metrics**
3. **Expand and Improve Documentation**
4. **Standardize Board Port Quality**
5. **Better Unit Testing and Mocking**
6. **Stable API Guarantees**
7. **Regression Testing**
8. **Perform Benchmarks Metrics**
9. **Create Templates for Documentation**
10. **Static Analysis into CI**
11. **Create a base board with a standard MCU plug/insert connector**
### Describe the solution you'd like
This is a summary of actions we need to take to improve NuttX quality and reliability
### Describe alternatives you've considered
No alternatives
### Verification
- [x] I have verified before submitting the report.
Contributor guide
Research direction
The issue lists eleven broad quality actions but names no files, tests, CI jobs, or entry points. Start by selecting one action and locating the relevant NuttX testing, documentation, board, or CI area; define a concrete scope and verification result before making changes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- c
- Domain
- ci-cd, documentation, embedded-iot, operating-systems, performance, testing-qa
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100